Pipher v. Loo (3/10/2009)

March 20, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Expert’s Opinion Based on Expert’s Own Experience in Field, Experience With Plaintiff’s Type of Injury, and Knowledge of Other Testimony in the Case Had Sufficient Foundation and Reliability to Be Admitted to Jury.

City of Phoenix v. Johnson – 3/3/2009

March 10, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds that Defendant in Condemnation Action is Entitled to Immediate Disbursement of Money Paid Into Court by City/Condemnor, Despite Appeal by City, Because the Automatic Stay Under Rule 62(g) Conflicts With the Condemnation Statute, Which Controls.

Vig v. Nix Project II Partnership (3/5/2009)

March 10, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That an Affidavit Is Proper Under A.R.S. § 33-422 When It Is Furnished to the Buyer at Least Seven Days Before Closing and Contains Sufficient Information to Put the Buyer on Inquiry Notice of All Relevant Conditions.

Hart v. Hart – 3/3/2009

March 10, 2009
Arizona Court ofAppeals Division One Holds That Family Court Erred in Its Child-Custody Order by (1) Failing to Make “Specific Findings on the Record About All Relevant Factors and the Reasons for Which the Decision Is in the Best Interests of the Child,” As Required by A.R.S. § 25-403(B), and (2) Failing to Apply the Correct Legal Standard in Ordering that Parenting Time Be Supervised.

Editor

  • Andrew G. Pappas

Contributors

  • Jacob Abrahamian
  • Payslie M. Bowman
  • Gideon Cionelo
  • Brandon T. Delgado
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Allie Karpurk
  • BriAnne Illich Meeds
  • Joshua J. Messer
  • Michael Moorin
  • Stefan Oakley
  • Sarah Pook Lawson
  • Molly Walker

Editors Emeritus

  • Thomas L. Hudson
  • Joseph N. Roth
  • Eric M. Fraser

Read More

Join Our Newsletter

Subscribe to AzApp

Browse by Year

RSS Feed