Skip to main content
Cravens v. Montano – 4/29/2025
May 5, 2025
The Arizona Supreme Court holds that (1) the term, “in connection with your business,” as defined in Cincinnati Indemnity Company’s automobile insurance policy, requires a covered vehicle to be used by an employee in furtherance of an employer’s business purpose, which does not include a routine commute to or from the employer’s office, and (2) a contingent Morris agreement is enforceable if it meets the substantive requirements of Morris agreements to ensure against fraud, collusion,