Arizona Supreme Court holds that A.R.S. § 12-821’s one-year limitations period does not apply to claims brought by one public entity against another, leaving the common-law nullum tempus doctrine intact.
The Arizona Supreme Court holds that amendments to A.R.S. § 12-910(F) did not eliminate substantial-evidence review for the superior court and confirms that appellate courts review such questions under ordinary appellate standards.
Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, holds that a claimant need not file a lawsuit under A.R.S. § 32-1133.01(F) in order to claim against the contractors’ recovery fund.