Arizona Supreme Court holds that the First Amendment bars defamation lawsuits brought by third parties referenced in political advertisements under certain circumstances.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that a Rule 60(b) motion cannot be used to evade the timeliness requirement of a motion for a new trial under Rule 59.
Arizona Supreme Court holds that parts of the state legislature’s budget reconciliation bills are void due to violations of the title requirement and single subject rule.
Arizona Supreme Court holds that, in a garnishment action by a judgment creditor against the judgment debtor’s insurer for loss coverage, the insurer may not invoke the doctrine of direct benefits estoppel to bind the judgment creditor to the arbitration terms in the insurance contract.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two holds that medical expert testimony regarding institutional standards of care are not subject to A.R.S. § 12-2604’s stricter requirements for that of individual providers.