Skip to main content
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc – 1/27/2006
January 27, 2006
United States Supreme Court Clarifies That a Rule 50(b) Motion Must Be Filed to Preserve Sufficiency of Evidence Challenges for Appeal.
News Article – 1/25/2006
January 25, 2006
District 7 Leaders Scramble For Smith Successor.
News Article – 1/26/2006
January 25, 2006
Arizona Has Ample Safeguards Against Abuse Of Eminent Domain.
Arizona v. Wall – 1/13/200
January 13, 2006
Arizona Supreme Court Holds That A Defendant Has A Right To A Lesser-Included Offense Instruction If Sufficient Evidence Supports The Instruction, Even If The Defendant Has Presented An “All-Or-Nothing” Defense.
Chaurisia v. General Motors – 1/3/2006
January 10, 2006
A Unanimous Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Panel Refuses to Expand Terms of "Limited Warranty" Offered by Car Dealer to Permit Revocation of Acceptance by Buyer.
Powell v. Washburn – 1/10/2006
January 10, 2006
Arizona Supreme Court adopts Restatement approach for interpreting restrictive covenants, holding that a restrictive covenant must be interpreted to give effect to the intention of the parties and to carry out the purpose for which it was created.