Arizona v. Wall – 1/13/200

January 13, 2006
Arizona Supreme Court Holds That A Defendant Has A Right To A Lesser-Included Offense Instruction If Sufficient Evidence Supports The Instruction, Even If The Defendant Has Presented An “All-Or-Nothing” Defense.

Powell v. Washburn – 1/10/2006

January 10, 2006
Arizona Supreme Court adopts Restatement approach for interpreting restrictive covenants, holding that a restrictive covenant must be interpreted to give effect to the intention of the parties and to carry out the purpose for which it was created.