State v. Newell – 5/1/2006

May 1, 2006
AZ Supreme Court Holds That Superior Court Did Not Commit Reversible Error Despite Capital Defendant’s Claims Of Miranda Violations, Involuntary Confession, Batson Challenge, Improper Vouching, Inadmissible Testimony During Penalty Phase, And Improper Exclusion Of Defendant’s Mental Health Expert.

Carlisle v. Petrosky – 4/11/2006

April 17, 2006
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That a Party Who Appeals a Compulsory Arbitration Award For Trial De Novo in Superior Court May Dismiss Appeal Where Other Party Did Not Appeal Arbitration Award and Was Not Prejudiced.

Progressive Classic Ins. Co. v. Blaud – 4/17/2006

April 17, 2006
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Plaintiff’s Claim Complies With Arizona’s Uninsured Motorist Act, A.R.S. § 20-259.01(M), By Alleging That He Collided With A Tire From An Unidentified Vehicle On An Interstate Freeway, But The Superior Court Erred By Ruling That, As A Matter Of Law, Plaintiff’s Uninsured Motorist Policy Covered His Claim.

State v. Schneider/Hanna – 3/30/2006

April 7, 2006
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One, on Special Action Review, Affirms the Trial Court’s Finding That Grand Jury Must Redetermine Probable Cause In Case Against City Council Members and City Clerk Because Former City Attorney Had Disclosed Attorney-Client Privileged Communications in His Grand Jury Testimony About His Communications with These City Officials.

Editors

  • Eric M. Fraser
  • Andrew G. Pappas

Contributors

  • Payslie M. Bowman
  • John Bullock
  • Emma J. Cone-Roddy
  • Brandon T. Delgado
  • Eric M. Fraser
  • Sarah Pook Lawson
  • Phillip Londen
  • BriAnne Illich Meeds
  • Joshua J. Messer
  • Michael Price

Editor Emeritus

  • Thomas L. Hudson
  • Joseph N. Roth

Read More

Join Our Newsletter

Subscribe to AzApp

Browse by Year

RSS Feed