Skip to main content
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Superior Court Did Not Abuse Its Discretion In Allowing Post-Judgment Intervention By a Non-Party Under Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b).
Hart v. Hart – 3/3/2009
March 10, 2009
Arizona Court ofAppeals Division One Holds That Family Court Erred in Its Child-Custody Order by (1) Failing to Make “Specific Findings on the Record About All Relevant Factors and the Reasons for Which the Decision Is in the Best Interests of the Child,” As Required by A.R.S. § 25-403(B), and (2) Failing to Apply the Correct Legal Standard in Ordering that Parenting Time Be Supervised.
Patches v. Industrial Commission of Arizona – 2/24/2009
March 3, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Housekeeping Services Are Not Compensable Services Under Arizona’s Workers’ Compensation System.
In Re MH 2007-001895 – 2/10/2009
March 3, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That the Trial Court Has Discretion to Decide Whether an Interpreter is Qualified.
Koepnick v. Arizona State Land Department – 2/26/2009
March 3, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Affirms a Decision by the State Land Department Reclassifying Trust Lands in Pinal County from Agricultural to Commercial.
In Re MH 2008-000438 (2/10/2009)
March 3, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds that Court-Ordered Examinations Pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-533 Must Be In-Person Physical Examinations.