Bogard v. Cannon & Wendt Electric Co., Inc. (1/27/2009)

February 3, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Reversal on Appeal of A Summary Judgment Motion That is Limited to the Specific Issues Raised in the Motion is Not A General Reversal Without Instructions; On Remand, A New Trial Court Judge Has no Jurisdiction to Reconsider Rulings Not Addressed in the Appeal.

Bilke v. State (1/29/2009)

February 3, 2009
Arizona Court ofAppeals Division One Holds An Individual Who Prevails in an Action Against the State or a Political Subdivision to Compel Compliance with a Statutory Obligation is Entitled to Recover Attorneys’ Fees Under A.R.S. § 12-2030(A), Even if the Action is Not Formally Entitled “Mandamus.”

Pride of San Juan, Inc. v. Pratt (1/29/2009)

February 3, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds that A Principal is Vicariously Liable for the Negligence of an Independent Contractor Crop Duster Because Crop Dusting Remains an Inherently Dangerous Activity Despite Safety Improvements.

City of Phoenix v. Fields – 1/22/2009

January 27, 2009
Arizona Supreme Court Holds that the Notice of Claim Statute, A.R.S. 12-821.01(A), Requires a Putative Class Representative to Include in His Notice of Claim (1) a “Specific Amount” for Which His Individual Claim Can Be Settled and (2) a Statement that, If Litigation Ensues, The Representative Intends to Seek Certification of a Plaintiff Class.

Editor

  • Andrew G. Pappas

Contributors

  • Jacob Abrahamian
  • Payslie M. Bowman
  • Gideon Cionelo
  • Brandon T. Delgado
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Allie Karpurk
  • BriAnne Illich Meeds
  • Joshua J. Messer
  • Michael Moorin
  • Stefan Oakley
  • Sarah Pook Lawson
  • Molly Walker

Editors Emeritus

  • Thomas L. Hudson
  • Joseph N. Roth
  • Eric M. Fraser

Read More

Join Our Newsletter

Subscribe to AzApp

Browse by Year

RSS Feed