Skip to main content
News Article – 11/13/2012
November 13, 2012
Seven Applicants Being Considered For Arizona Court of Appeals
Yanes v. Maricopa County – 11/13/2012
November 12, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Plaintiff Alleging Violation of 42 U.S.C. §1983 Based on Malicious Prosecution Must Prove Violation of Fourth Amendment Right Against Unlawful Seizure.
Para v. Anderson – 11/1/2012
November 5, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That a Party May Not Insulate an Expert from Discovery by Redesignating Him a Consultant.
Gorman v. Pima County (10/4/2012)
October 29, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That Pima County Has Not Delegated General Contracting Power to the County Administrator and That In an Equitable Estoppel Claims Against a Government Actor, a Mere Writing Does Not Necessarily Satisfy the Requirement That the Actions Relied On Bear a Sufficient Degree of Formalism.
In re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System and Source – 9/12/2012
October 29, 2012
Arizona Supreme Court Holds That Federal Water Rights Were Not Impliedly Reserved on Lands Granted by the United States Government to the State of Arizona to Support Educational and Other Public Institutions.
Caruthers v. Underhill – 10/9/2012
October 25, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Directors and Officers Generally Do Not Owe a Duty to Disclose Inside Information When Purchasing Shareholder’s Stock, but That There Is a Limited Duty If Special Facts (i.e., Material Facts) Exist.