Fogliano v. State (12/6/2011)

December 13, 2011
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Whether the Legislature Complied with Proposition 204’s Directive to Provide Supplemental Funding to the AHCCCS From “Any Other Available Sources” Presents a Political Question Not Appropriate for Judicial Resolution.

SWC Baseline & Crimson Investors, LLC v. Augusta Ranch Limited Partnership – 11/22/2011

December 6, 2011
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds, inter alia,That (1) a Party Who Lacks Title When Allegedly Groundless Documents Are Recorded Cannot Assert a Claim as the Owner or Beneficial Title Holder Under A.R.S. § 33-420; and (2) a Party that Records a Quitclaim Deed That Asserts No Particular Interest in the Property and Contains No False Statements May Not Be Held Liable Under A.R.S. § 33-420(C) if the Chain of Title is Sufficiently Confusing Such that the Party Does Not Know Its Claim in