Skip to main content
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That Equivocal Medical Expert Testimony Is Not Competent Evidence to Support the Denial of a Workers’ Compensation Award.
Grubb v. Do It Best Corporation – 5/14/2012
May 31, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That A Cooperative Does Not Qualify as a Seller for Purposes of Product Liability When a Member Store Orders the Product Directly From the Vendor in a Drop-Ship Order, But the Vendor Sends the Bill to the Cooperative
Cal X-tra v. W.V.S.V. Holdings L.L.C. – 4/24/2012
May 31, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That (1) Relief from a Judgment Obtained by Extrinsic Fraud Is Appropriate under Rule 60(c) and (2) A.R.S. § 29-833(A) Does Not Permit an Award of Attorneys’ Fees in Favor of a Derivative Plaintiff Against Its Opponent in That Litigation.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That The Mere Fact That Currency Subject To Forfeiture Was Located In A Vehicle Does Not Obligate The State To Provide Notice Of The Pending Forfeiture To The Vehicle’s Owner.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds that the Purchaser of a Vehicle at Auction Failed to State a Claim for Consumer Fraud Where the Bidder Agreement He Signed Disclaimed that the Auctioneer Made Any Representations Concerning Any Auction Vehicle.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That Prejudgment Interest under Rule 68(g) Is Calculated from the Date of the Offer of Judgment Until the Date of the Final Judgment Entered in the Case After Any Motion for New Trial or Appeal.