Skip to main content
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That The Mere Fact That Currency Subject To Forfeiture Was Located In A Vehicle Does Not Obligate The State To Provide Notice Of The Pending Forfeiture To The Vehicle’s Owner.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds that the Purchaser of a Vehicle at Auction Failed to State a Claim for Consumer Fraud Where the Bidder Agreement He Signed Disclaimed that the Auctioneer Made Any Representations Concerning Any Auction Vehicle.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That Prejudgment Interest under Rule 68(g) Is Calculated from the Date of the Offer of Judgment Until the Date of the Final Judgment Entered in the Case After Any Motion for New Trial or Appeal.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That (1) A.R.S. §§ 16- 918(C) and 16-924(B) Authorize A Single Civil Penalty For the Failure to File a Campaign Finance Report.
State ex rel. Horne v. AutoZone, Inc. – 5/15/2012
May 22, 2012
Arizona Supreme Court Holds That (1) When the State Alleges Multiple Violations of A.R.S. § 41-2081 as the Basis for a Consumer Fraud Act Claim, a Jury May Determine That Either the “Act Clause” or the “Omission Clause” of A.R.S. § 44-1522(A) Applies; (2) A.R.S. § 44-1582(A)(1) Does Not Authorize Disgorgement to the State for Violations of the Consumer Fraud Act.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That a Guarantee Need Not Contain an Express Agreement Regarding Forum Selection for a Guarantor to be Subjected to a Particular Forum and That Arizona Courts do Not Inquire Into Convenience or the State’s Interest in the Lawsuit When Examining a Forum Selection Clause’s Reasonableness.