Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that for purposes of Rule 77(h) sanctions in an arbitration appeal, courts must compare whether the total judgment on the trial de novo is 23 percent more favorable than the total arbitration award.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that injunctive and declaratory relief are generally available for a claim that federal law preempts the enforcement of a state-law created right.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that a worker’s compensation claim for PTSD is timely if the claim is filed within one year of diagnosis and there is no evidence that a diagnosis could have been made earlier.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that Arizona Corporation Commission’s broad ratemaking power under the Arizona Constitution and statutorily delegated power to determine a just remedy for inadequate public utility equipment, facilities, or services allow the Commission to impose an interim manager upon a utility under appropriate circumstances.