Skip to main content
The Arizona Supreme Court amends the rules for supersedeas bonds effective January 1, 2019.
Excell Agent Services, L.L.C. v. Arizona Department of Revenue (9/4/2008)
September 10, 2018
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That a Company Providing Outsourced Directory Assistance to Telecommunications Companies Is Not Itself Engaged in the Telecommunications Business for Purposes of a Statutory Exemption to the Arizona Transaction Privilege Tax.
Stair v. Maricopa Cty. – 9/4/2018
September 10, 2018
The Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that a criminal statute imposes a duty in tort to a particular plaintiff only when the statute is designed to protect the class of persons that includes the plaintiff against the risk of the type of harm that occurred as a result of its violation.
Tapia v. Indus. Comm’n of Ariz. – 8/16/2018
September 10, 2018
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two holds that in evaluating a workers’ compensation claim, a self-insured employer is responsible for its own communications failures.
Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co. v. Pheasant Grove LLC – 8/23/2018
September 4, 2018
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that when a claim for reformation is time-barred, a request for declaratory judgment seeking substantively the same relief as the reformation claim is also time-barred.
Chula Vista Homeowners Ass’n v. Irwin – 7/27/2018
September 4, 2018
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two holds that attorneys’ fees awarded under A.R.S. § 33-420(A), which authorizes fees for slander-of-title claims, are not part of damages for purposes of calculating a supersedeas bond.