Skip to main content
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that (1) the timeliness of a motion to intervene is measured from when the movant has notice that its interests are not being adequately represented, and (2) the ability to file another lawsuit does not, by itself, preclude intervention.
Eleven individuals applied to fill the vacancy on the Arizona Supreme Court created by Chief Justice Bales’s retirement.
Eleven individuals applied to fill the vacancy on Division One of the Arizona Court of Appeals created by the appointment of Justice Beene to the Arizona Supreme Court.
The Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, announces the election of new court leadership effective July 1, 2019.
Shepherd v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (4/30/2019)
May 29, 2019
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that HIPAA does not preempt a state-law claim for negligent disclosure of healthcare information, but federal requirements may inform the standard of care for such claims.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that a notice of nonparty at fault need not always identify the nonparty’s name or location.