Skip to main content
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that judgments secured in Dutch courts could be domesticated under Arizona’s version of the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act, A.R.S. §§ 12-3251 to -3254.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that A.R.S. § 23-1380 does not authorize the Department of Insurance to require a health insurer to discontinue all coverage when the insurer ceases to offer some coverage.
Humphrey v. State (4/30/2020)
May 18, 2020
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One held that tort claims were barred by failure to comply with the notice of claim statute, A.R.S. § 12-821.01.
Laveen Meadows Homeowners Ass’n v. Mejia – 5/5/2020
May 13, 2020
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that the phrase “may be foreclosed” in A.R.S. § 33-1807 refers to the commencement of a civil action seeking foreclosure rather than the issuance of a judgment of foreclosure and, therefore, partial payment of a lien does not entitle one to relief under Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b).
New Division One panels announced – 4/27/2020
May 7, 2020
The Arizona Court of Appeals Division One released the panel assignments for July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020.
Goldman v. Sahl – 3/5/2020
April 29, 2020
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One held that (1) a communication that occurs preliminary to a judicial proceeding may be privileged against defamation claims when the defendant was “seriously considering” commencing litigation or had a good-faith basis to believe someone else was; and (2) Supreme Court Rule 48(l) does not bar abuse of judicial process claims involving a professional-discipline proceeding but the mere submission of a bar complaint that is dismissed without further action