Arizona Supreme Court Holds that It has Concurrent, Not Exclusive Jurisdiction with the Courts of Appeals Over Actions Challenging the Certification of Signatures for a Ballot Measure and Such Actions Must, in the Future, Be Filed with the Relevant Court of Appeal.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds that Tavern was Properly Held Exempt from Dramshop Liability when Drunk Driving Accident Occurred After Tavern Staff Confiscated Drunk Patron’s Car Keys and Drove Her Home.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That The “Sham Affidavit” Rule Applies Where A Party/Witness’ Deposition Testimony Contradicts The Party/Witness’ Earlier Affidavit, But Declines To Apply The Rule In This Case.