News Article – 4/11/2007

April 11, 2007
Arizona Supreme Court decision that both businesses and people, cited for violating certain city ordinances, are entitled to get their costs paid if they win the case.

Gorman v. State – 4/5/2007

April 11, 2007
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Under Probate Code's Provision for Paying Contingent Claims by an Estate, "Allow[ing] or Establish[ing]" a Claim Does Not Make a Claim Certain.

Stewart v. Carroll – 3/13/2007

March 29, 2007
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Provisions of Arizona’s Juror-Exemption Statute Allowing Prospective Jurors 75 and Older to Opt Out of Jury Service and Prohibiting Public disclosure of Prospective Jurors’ Medical Statements Do Not Violate the Arizona Constitution.

Kim v. Mansoori – 3/23/2007

March 27, 2007
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That a Court May Not Certify an Attorney Fee Claim as a Final Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) in Advance of a Related Judgment Regarding the Merits.