Hamill v. Mid-Century Ins. Co. – 9/3/2010

September 17, 2010
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That When a Motorist’s Insurance Company States That It Will Pay Any Judgment or Settlement Regardless of the Policy’s Stated Liability Limit, The Motorist Is Not an Underinsured Motorist for Purposes of A.R.S. § 20-259.01.

Preston v. Kindred Hospitals West, L.L.C. (8/5/2010)

September 10, 2010
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Rule 17(a) Does Not Require Plaintiffs to Establish That the Proper Plaintiff Was Difficult to Determine or That They Made an Understandable Mistake Before Being Allowed to Join or Substitute the Proper Plaintiff.

Editor

  • Andrew G. Pappas

Contributors

  • Jacob Abrahamian
  • Payslie M. Bowman
  • Gideon Cionelo
  • Brandon T. Delgado
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Allie Karpurk
  • BriAnne Illich Meeds
  • Joshua J. Messer
  • Michael Moorin
  • Stefan Oakley
  • Sarah Pook Lawson
  • Molly Walker

Editors Emeritus

  • Thomas L. Hudson
  • Joseph N. Roth
  • Eric M. Fraser

Read More

Join Our Newsletter

Subscribe to AzApp

Browse by Year

RSS Feed