Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That When A Plaintiff Sues on a Single Theory of Fraud-In-The-Inducement, an Election of Remedies is not Required.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds: Article 9, Section 22(D) of the Arizona Constitution Does Not Grant Sole Authority to the Legislature to Determine when a Supermajority Vote is Required to Increase Existing Taxes or Impose New Taxes; the Legislators Had Standing to Challenge whether Their Votes Were Given the Effect to Which They were Constitutionally Entitled; and Constituents, Including Taxpayers, Did Not Have Standing to Challenge the Constitutionality of A.R.S. § 36-2901.08.
Arizona Court Supreme Court Holds That a Landowner’s Right of Access from Its Property to a Road Constitutes a Compensable Property Right Under Article 2, Section 17, of the Arizona Constitution, but That the Government Does Not Impair Such a Right if It Alters a Road but Leaves Existing Access Points Unchanged, Unless the Access to the Roadway System Is “Unreasonably Circuitous.”
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That a Business Holding an Easement for Invitees’ Ingress and Egress Has a Duty to Provide for the Safety of Invitees Using the Easement.
Arizona Supreme Court Holds That A.R.S. § 16-941(B) Provides A Formula For Calculating Campaign Contribution Limits For Traditional Candidates For Statewide And State Legislative Offices.