Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two holds that government must provide a specific and concrete privacy interest before it may redact information from a public record.
Arizona Supreme Court holds that a claim for punitive damages in a negligence case requires clear and convincing proof that the defendant consciously pursued a course of conduct that created a substantial risk of significant injury to others.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that a traveling employee, who was on a break performing a personal errand on a customer’s property when he sustained a head injury, was within the course of his employment for purposes of the Arizona Workers’ Compensation Act.
Arizona Supreme Court holds that a fact witness may also offer expert opinion testimony based on personal observation and participation without violating the One Expert Rule.