Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that when a business agrees to be a co-employer of workers, the workers are not “leased employees” for purposes of the Arizona State Retirement System.
Arizona Supreme Court holds that an employer who uses asbestos owes no duty of care to members of the public harmed by asbestos residue carried on the work clothes of employees, including employees’ family members. The Court also holds that Arizona will not adopt the duty framework set out in the Third Restatement of Torts.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two holds that the Arizona Corporation Commission’s approval of a rate plan that decreased but did not eliminate subsidies among customer classes was not arbitrary, unlawful, or unsupported by substantial evidence.