The Arizona Supreme Court holds that a dram shop may remain liable for injuries that occur after an overserved patron gets home, sleeps, then decides to drive.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two holds that a court should analyze the reasonableness of a liquidated damages provision based on the facts known at the time of contract formation.
Arizona Supreme Court holds that a voter proposition creating an income tax surcharge to fund schools violates the Education Expenditure Clause, Ariz. Const. art. 9, § 21.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that testimony that an employee told his employer about his pre-existing conditions is sufficient evidence to support allocation of expenses for disability benefits.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two holds that, in a vehicular wrongful death or injury case, the fact that the defendant was using a cell phone while driving at the time of the accident may support a claim for punitive damages if, along with evidence of cell phone use, there is other evidence the driver was consciously pursuing a course of conduct knowing that it creates a substantial risk of significant harm to others.