Arizona Supreme Court Holds That A Claim Letter Sent to a Public Entity Containing Qualifying Language Regarding Damage Claims Fails to Satisfy the Requirements of Arizona’s Notice of Claim Statute.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That A Subcontractor Is Required to Arbitrate a General Contractor’s Indemnity Claim Against It Where the Subcontract Expressly Incorporates “General Conditions,” Which in Turn Incorporate The Arbitration Provision of the Prime Contract Between the General
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That Finding No Conflict Between Two Provisions Governing the Regulation of Contractors, a Unanimous Division Two Panel Affirms Award For Subcontractor Against Contractor.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds that ARS 13-807 Does Not Preclude a Defendant From Raising an Affirmative Defense in a Civil Proceeding Arising out of Acts for Which he has been Convicted in a Criminal Case.