Skip to main content
Ratliff v. Hardison – 11/26/2008
December 9, 2008
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That Retraction of Anticipatory Repudiation of Contract Must Be Clear and Unequivocal to Be Effective.
Buccellato v. Morgan – 12/4/2008
December 9, 2008
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Affirms That Adult Service Providers Are Not Entitled to a Jury Trial for Violating Provisions of the Scottsdale City Code Governing Adult Service Providers.
S
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control Dist (11/28/2008)
December 9, 2008
Arizona Court ofAppeals Division One Holds that a Damron/Morris Agreement Can Be Enforceable even if the Agreement Arises out of an Indemnity and Hold-Harmless Provision Within a Property Easement Agreement, Rather Than an Insurance Contract, But the Ultimate Liability of the Indemnitor Will Depend on the Language and Intent of the Underlying Indemnity Provision.
Sklar v. Town of Fountain Hills – 11/25/2008
December 9, 2008
Arizona Court ofAppeals Division One Holds That Referendum Petitions Must Strictly Comply with A.R.S. § 19-101(A), Which Requires Them to Identify the Principle Provisions of the Challenged Government Acts.
Arizona Supreme Court Holds that the Ten-Day Limitation for Judicial Review Contained in A.R.S. § 19-122(A) Applies to Challenges to the Secretary of State’s Actions Under A.R.S. § 19-121.01, Including the Disqualification of Signature Sheets and Signatures Submitted in Support of an Initiative.
Quintero v. Rodgers – 11/18/2008
November 24, 2008
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That A.R.S. § 14-3110 Precludes Damages for Loss of Enjoyment of Life But Does Not Preclude Recovery of Punitive Damages.