Skip to main content
Aida v.MaricopaCounty – 6/11/2009
June 23, 2009
Arizona Court ofAppeals Division One Holds That a Tax Discrimination Claim May Be Based on the Initial Values Assessed.
County ofCochise (6/16/2009)
June 23, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Meaning of A.R.S. § 11-830(A)(2) and Holds that Feed Lot Operations are Not “General Agricultural Uses” Exempt from County Zoning.
Huerta v. Superior Court (6/16/2009)
June 23, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That a Party Whose Case is Consolidated With Another May Not Exercise a Peremptory Change of Judge if a Party on the Same Side in the Other Case Has Already Exercised a Peremptory Change of Judge.
Arpaio v. Davis – 6/2/2009
June 17, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Affirms that Arizona Supreme Court Rule 123 Governs Requests for Judicial Records and a Presiding Judge May Appoint Another Judge on the Same Court to Perform an Administrative Review of Requested Records.
Arizona Court ofAppeals Division Two Holds That Where a Lease Provides for Its Termination at the Lessor ’s Option on Condemnation of the Property, the Lessee Has No Right to Compensation for the Taking if the Option is Exercised.
Douglas v. Governing Board of Window Rock – 6/5/2009
June 5, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Acceptance of Rule 68 Offer of Judgment Encompasses Both Individual and Class Claims Unless the Offer Specifies Otherwise.