Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That A Plaintiff Claiming Indigency has the Burden of Proof When a Defendant Challenges Plaintiff’s Status Under A.R.S. § 12-302.
Arizona Court of Appeals Holds Division One That Absent a Showing of True Necessity, Based on Unavailability, Telephonic Testimony of a Doctor at a Hearing for Court-Ordered Treatment Violates the Patient’s Rights.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That an Immaterial Breach of the Lease Did Not Deprive the Tenant of the Power to Renew, Even Though the Tenant Had to Be “In Compliance” with Lease to Renew.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Vacates Family Court’s Custody Order Because It Did Not Adequately Make Findings Concerning the Factors in A.R.S. § 25-403(B) and Allows Argument on Appeal Not Raised in the Family Court.
Plaintiff Santa Maria filed a complaint, in response to which Defendant Najera answered and counterclaimed. Thereafter, Najera moved for summary judgment on some of Santa Maria’s claims. When Santa Maria filed no response to the summary judgment motion, the Superior Court entered partial summary judgment on those claims in favor […]
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds Award of Sole Custody Appropriate if Court Finds a History of Domestic Violence, but When Deciding Whether Parent May Relocate Children, the Court Must Make Specific Findings Regarding All Relevant Statutory Factors.