Skip to main content
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Vacates Superior Court’s Order Requiring Insurance Company’s Expert Physician to Produce Extensive Documentation In Response to Subpoena Duces Tecum
Hammoudeh v. Jada – 10/9/2009
October 20, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That When It Is Apparent from the Record That Discovery Violations Are the Fault of the Party, As Opposed To the Party’s Attorney, Court Need Not Hold Evidentiary Hearing Prior to Sanctioning Party with Dismissal or Entry of Default Judgment.
Grand v. Nacchio, et al. – 9/29/2009
October 20, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That A Private Plaintiff Brining Claims for Secondary Liability Under the Arizona Securities Act Must First Establish Primary Liability Under A.R.S. § 44-2003(A).
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Inverse Eminent Domain Claims Must Demonstrate an Increased Risk of Sufficient Magnitude, and a Depreciation in Property Value.
In re MH 2008-001795 – 9/29/2009
October 13, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That A Psychiatric Resident Physician with a One-Year Training Permit Qualifies as a “Licensed Physician” for the Purpose of Completing a Petition for Court-Ordered Evaluation.
Premiere RV & Mini Storage LLC v. Maricopa County (9/15/2009)
September 22, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That A Property “Split” Occurs For Tax Purposes When the Assessor Completes the Process of Identifying and Valuing the Resulting Parcels, Not When a Portion of the Property Is Sold.