In Re MH 2008-002596 – 10/20/2009

October 26, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds There is No Requirement for a Minimum Number of Encounters or Time of Acquaintance to Qualify as an Acquaintance Witness in a Hearing for Involuntary Mental Health Treatment.

Hammoudeh v. Jada – 10/9/2009

October 20, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That When It Is Apparent from the Record That Discovery Violations Are the Fault of the Party, As Opposed To the Party’s Attorney, Court Need Not Hold Evidentiary Hearing Prior to Sanctioning Party with Dismissal or Entry of Default Judgment.

Grand v. Nacchio, et al. – 9/29/2009

October 20, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That A Private Plaintiff Brining Claims for Secondary Liability Under the Arizona Securities Act Must First Establish Primary Liability Under A.R.S. § 44-2003(A).

In re MH 2008-001795 – 9/29/2009

October 13, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That A Psychiatric Resident Physician with a One-Year Training Permit Qualifies as a “Licensed Physician” for the Purpose of Completing a Petition for Court-Ordered Evaluation.

Editor

  • Andrew G. Pappas

Contributors

  • Jacob Abrahamian
  • Payslie M. Bowman
  • Gideon Cionelo
  • Brandon T. Delgado
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Allie Karpurk
  • BriAnne Illich Meeds
  • Joshua J. Messer
  • Michael Moorin
  • Stefan Oakley
  • Sarah Pook Lawson
  • Molly Walker

Editors Emeritus

  • Thomas L. Hudson
  • Joseph N. Roth
  • Eric M. Fraser

Read More

Join Our Newsletter

Subscribe to AzApp

Browse by Year

RSS Feed