In re MH 2010-00029 – 10/6/2010

October 20, 2010
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That A Physician’s Examination Via A Video-Conferencing System Does Not Qualify As a “Complete Physical Examination” Under A.R.S. §§ 36-501(14) and 533(B).

Keefer v. Keefer – 9/28/2010

October 14, 2010
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That When the Amount of SSDI Dependency Payments Exceeds the Monthly Child Support Obligation, the Excess May Satisfy the Disabled Parent’s Share of Current Unreimbursed Medical Expenses.

Valento v. Valento (9/23/2010)

September 27, 2010
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One (1) Prescribes the Method for Calculating the Community’s Equitable Lien in Separate Property When Community Funds Have Reduced the Principal or Increased the Market Value of the Property but the Property’s Value Has Depreciated During Marriage, and (2) Concludes That Parol Evidence May Not Contradict the Unambiguous Language of a Deed Conveying Property Jointly to Spouses.

Nielson v. Hicks – 9/21/2010

September 22, 2010
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That When Real Property Is Not the Basis of a Plaintiff’s Claim, but Is Rather Peripheral to the Action, A.R.S. § 12-401(12) Governing Mandatory Venue in Real Property Matters Does Not Apply.

Editor

  • Andrew G. Pappas

Contributors

  • Jacob Abrahamian
  • Payslie M. Bowman
  • Gideon Cionelo
  • Brandon T. Delgado
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Allie Karpurk
  • BriAnne Illich Meeds
  • Joshua J. Messer
  • Michael Moorin
  • Stefan Oakley
  • Sarah Pook Lawson
  • Molly Walker

Editors Emeritus

  • Thomas L. Hudson
  • Joseph N. Roth
  • Eric M. Fraser

Read More

Join Our Newsletter

Subscribe to AzApp

Browse by Year

RSS Feed