Arizona Supreme Court holds that a claim for punitive damages in a negligence case requires clear and convincing proof that the defendant consciously pursued a course of conduct that created a substantial risk of significant injury to others.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that a traveling employee, who was on a break performing a personal errand on a customer’s property when he sustained a head injury, was within the course of his employment for purposes of the Arizona Workers’ Compensation Act.
Arizona Supreme Court holds that a fact witness may also offer expert opinion testimony based on personal observation and participation without violating the One Expert Rule.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that any person aggrieved by a Director of Gaming’s licensing decision (and not just the license applicant) may appeal that decision to the Arizona Racing Commission.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that filing a complaint for special action relief does not qualify as timely review of an administrative decision under the Arizona Administrative Review Act.