Author: PaperStreet Web Design

Rogone v. Sasser – 9/25/2014

September 30, 2014
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That a Court May Not Rely on Equitable Grounds to Deny a Homestead Exemption Under A.R.S. § 33-1101(A)(1), if the Resident Meets the Statutory Qualifications.

Gries v. Plaza Del Rio Management Corp. – 9/9/2014

September 24, 2014
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That the Word “Shall” in A.R.S. § 10-1434(E) Is Directory and Not Mandatory, Merely Establishing the Order of Events; Thus, a Court May Discontinue Proceedings on a Shareholder’s Election to Purchase Shares in Lieu of Dissolution If It Would Be Equitable to the Corporation and Shareholders.

Weitz v. Heth – 8/26/2014

September 5, 2014
Arizona Supreme Court Holds That (1) A.R.S. § 33-992(A) Does Not Preclude Assignments by Equitable Subrogation of a Lien That Attached Before Construction Began on the Project at Issue and (2) When a Single Mortgage Burdens Multiple Parcels, a Third Party May Be Entitled to Equitable Subrogation When That Party Has Paid a Pro Rata Amount of the Obligation and Obtained a Full Release of the Parcel at Issue from the Mortgage.

Editor

  • Andrew G. Pappas

Contributors

  • Jacob Abrahamian
  • Payslie M. Bowman
  • Gideon Cionelo
  • Brandon T. Delgado
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Allie Karpurk
  • BriAnne Illich Meeds
  • Joshua J. Messer
  • Michael Moorin
  • Stefan Oakley
  • Sarah Pook Lawson
  • Molly Walker

Editors Emeritus

  • Thomas L. Hudson
  • Joseph N. Roth
  • Eric M. Fraser

Read More

Join Our Newsletter

Subscribe to AzApp

Browse by Year

RSS Feed