Author: PaperStreet Web Design

In Re $70,070 – 9/30/2014

October 13, 2014
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That Under A.R.S. § 13-4311(H), a Motion for Summary Judgment Is Not a Responsive Pleading and That the Trial Court Improperly Considered Evidence When It Ruled on a Motion to Dismiss.

Fisher v. Edgerton – 9/30/2014

October 13, 2014
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 77(f) Permits Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs to Co-Defendant, When Defendant Unsuccessfully Seeks to Shift Fault to Co-Defendant at Trial De Novo Following Compulsory Arbitration.

Ponderosa Fire Department v. Coconino County – 8/28/2014

October 3, 2014
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That A.R.S. § 11-821(C) and Coconino County Subdivision Ordinance No. 82-3, Section 4.14(A)(2) Allow the County to Exercise Discretion in Deciding When, and Under What Circumstances, It May Call Performance Bonds Posted by a Developer to Ensure Completion of Subdivision Improvements.