Yearly Archives: 2012

FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C. – 6/21/2012

July 2, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That (1) U.C.C. Article 9 Does Not Create a Cause of Action for Interference with Collateral; (2) Retroactive Application of the Remedies Provision in the Revised Article 9 Does Not Unconstitutionally Abrogate Contract Rights; and (3) Every Aspect of the Disposition of Collateral Must be Commercially Reasonable, Including the Deadline for the Disposition.

Cardoso v. Soldo (5/29/2012)

June 25, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That the Collateral Consequence Exception to Mootness Applies when the Consequences of an Otherwise Moot Order Will Continue to Affect a Party.