Skip to main content
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That for Purposes of Determining the Priority of Security Interests in Collateral Under A.R.S. § 47-9307(B)-(C), a Debtor Is Located in Washington, D.C. if the Debtor Resides in a Jurisdiction That Does Not Generally Require the Recording of Security Interests in Order to Obtain Priority over Lien Creditors.
Yearly Archives: 2012
BNSF Railway Co. v. Buttrick – 12/29/2011
January 23, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That a Trial Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Granting a Rule 26(c) Protective Order Denying Employer Access to CBA-Required Notices Concerning Injured Employee’s Medical Status.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds that Defendant May Enter a Damron Settlement Agreement, Assigning Defendant’s Rights Against Primary Insurer, Notwithstanding Defense of Defendant by Excess Insurer.
Judge Johnsen Elected Vice Chief Judge – 1/18/2012
January 18, 2012
news
Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc. – 12/28/2011
January 17, 2012
Prior Course of Dealing Alone Does Not Create an Implied Contract; and (2) an Agency Relationship Between a Developer and General Contractor Is Not Implied and Must Be Supported by Evidence Establishing Such a Fiduciary Relationship Between Parties.
The Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, PC (12/20/2011)
January 6, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds that Rules Regarding the Accrual of Legal Malpractice Claims During Litigation Are Not Applicable Outside of the Litigation Context and Refuses to Decide Whether to Adopt the Continuous Representation Rule in Arizona.