Skip to main content
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That Prejudgment Interest under Rule 68(g) Is Calculated from the Date of the Offer of Judgment Until the Date of the Final Judgment Entered in the Case After Any Motion for New Trial or Appeal.
Yearly Archives: 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That (1) A.R.S. §§ 16- 918(C) and 16-924(B) Authorize A Single Civil Penalty For the Failure to File a Campaign Finance Report.
State ex rel. Horne v. AutoZone, Inc. – 5/15/2012
May 22, 2012
Arizona Supreme Court Holds That (1) When the State Alleges Multiple Violations of A.R.S. § 41-2081 as the Basis for a Consumer Fraud Act Claim, a Jury May Determine That Either the “Act Clause” or the “Omission Clause” of A.R.S. § 44-1522(A) Applies; (2) A.R.S. § 44-1582(A)(1) Does Not Authorize Disgorgement to the State for Violations of the Consumer Fraud Act.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That a Guarantee Need Not Contain an Express Agreement Regarding Forum Selection for a Guarantor to be Subjected to a Particular Forum and That Arizona Courts do Not Inquire Into Convenience or the State’s Interest in the Lawsuit When Examining a Forum Selection Clause’s Reasonableness.
Long v. Olen (5/3/2012)
May 15, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That the Ex Parte Communication Between Trial Court and a Party’s Counsel Did Not Warrant a New Trial Because There Was No Reasonable Probability That the Opposing Party was Prejudiced as a Result of the Ex Parte Communications.
Kimicata v. McGee (5/10/2012)
May 14, 2012
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That A Court May Award Attorneys’ Fees In Connection With Proceedings To Modify, Quash, Or Continue An Injunction Against Harassment.