Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case may cross-examine a standard-of-care expert about the expert’s personal practices.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that: (1) an Arizona company’s sales of securities outside of Arizona are subject to Arizona’s blue-sky securities statutes; (2) those laws are not preempted by federal law; and (3) they do not impose an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that (i) issue of punitive damages should be submitted to the jury when a question of fact regarding intent is presented; (ii) a statutory right to attorneys’ fees under A.R.S. § 46-455(H) accrued when the claim accrued; and (iii) “costs of suit” under A.R.S. § 46-455(H) does not expand the definition of taxable costs under A.R.S. § 12-332.
Arizona Supreme Court holds that failure to attach an information statement to a certified copy of a judgment when seeking to create a judgment lien does not invalidate an otherwise valid lien but does affect the priority of the lienholder.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One holds that medical standard of care experts who practice in a subspecialty are not qualified experts in the more general specialty.