Yearly Archives: 2011

SWC Baseline & Crimson Investors, LLC v. Augusta Ranch Limited Partnership – 11/22/2011

December 6, 2011
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds, inter alia,That (1) a Party Who Lacks Title When Allegedly Groundless Documents Are Recorded Cannot Assert a Claim as the Owner or Beneficial Title Holder Under A.R.S. § 33-420; and (2) a Party that Records a Quitclaim Deed That Asserts No Particular Interest in the Property and Contains No False Statements May Not Be Held Liable Under A.R.S. § 33-420(C) if the Chain of Title is Sufficiently Confusing Such that the Party Does Not Know Its Claim in

Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp (10/12/2011)

December 2, 2011
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That, for a Mechanic’s Lien to be Valid, the Description Contained in the Twenty-Day Notice Required by A.R.S. § 33-992.01(C) Must be Sufficient to Allow a Stranger to the Transaction to Identify Both What the Lien Claimant Has Provided and to Which Specific Property Any Future Lien Will Attach.

Rumery v. Baier – 11/10/2011

December 2, 2011
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That A.R.S. § 37-527 Violates Article 10, Section 7 of the Arizona Constitution By Depriving the Trust Beneficiaries of the Most Substantial Support Possible and Full Benefit of the Grant.

Editors

  • Eric M. Fraser
  • Andrew G. Pappas

Contributors

  • Payslie M. Bowman
  • John Bullock
  • Emma J. Cone-Roddy
  • Brandon T. Delgado
  • Eric M. Fraser
  • Sarah Pook Lawson
  • Phillip Londen
  • BriAnne Illich Meeds
  • Joshua J. Messer
  • Michael Price

Editor Emeritus

  • Thomas L. Hudson
  • Joseph N. Roth

Read More

Join Our Newsletter

Subscribe to AzApp

Browse by Year

RSS Feed