Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Trier of Fact Must Decide Any Issue of Material Fact Concerning Compliance With Arizona’s Notice of Claim Statute.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That A.R.S. § 17-340 Does Not Provide the Arizona Game and Fish Commission With the Authority to Impose Consecutive Sanctions.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Before a Municipality is Authorized to Impose a Development Fee Pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-463.05, the Public Service Must be Rationally Related to the Powers Granted to a Municipality, and That the Service Must be One That Traditionally Has Been Provided or Lawfully Forecast Pursuant to Statutes Governing Municipal Planning.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That “Accrual” under the Notice of Claims Statute Differs From the “Facts Sufficient” to Support the Claim.
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Real-Estate Sales Contracts May Disclaim Liability For Representations By Sellers Regarding Square Footage.