Yearly Archives: 2009

Hammoudeh v. Jada – 10/9/2009

October 20, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That When It Is Apparent from the Record That Discovery Violations Are the Fault of the Party, As Opposed To the Party’s Attorney, Court Need Not Hold Evidentiary Hearing Prior to Sanctioning Party with Dismissal or Entry of Default Judgment.

Grand v. Nacchio, et al. – 9/29/2009

October 20, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That A Private Plaintiff Brining Claims for Secondary Liability Under the Arizona Securities Act Must First Establish Primary Liability Under A.R.S. § 44-2003(A).

In re MH 2008-001795 – 9/29/2009

October 13, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That A Psychiatric Resident Physician with a One-Year Training Permit Qualifies as a “Licensed Physician” for the Purpose of Completing a Petition for Court-Ordered Evaluation.