Skip to main content
AzApp – 2/11/2009
February 11, 2009
Share AzAPP Posts!
Yearly Archives: 2009
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc. (1/30/2009)
February 10, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That a Seller May Only Be a “Successful Party” Under the Purchaser Dwelling Actions Act After a Final Judgment.
Tilley v. Delci (1/29/2009)
February 4, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Summary Judgment is Not a Sanction.
League ofArizonaCities and Towns v. Martin (2/3/2009)
February 4, 2009
Arizona Supreme Court Holds That a Statutory Measure Requiring Incorporated Cities and Town to Deposit Money into the State General Fund Is Not an Appropriation That May Be Included in the General Appropriations Bill.
Bogard v. Cannon & Wendt Electric Co., Inc. (1/27/2009)
February 3, 2009
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That Reversal on Appeal of A Summary Judgment Motion That is Limited to the Specific Issues Raised in the Motion is Not A General Reversal Without Instructions; On Remand, A New Trial Court Judge Has no Jurisdiction to Reconsider Rulings Not Addressed in the Appeal.
Bilke v. State (1/29/2009)
February 3, 2009
Arizona Court ofAppeals Division One Holds An Individual Who Prevails in an Action Against the State or a Political Subdivision to Compel Compliance with a Statutory Obligation is Entitled to Recover Attorneys’ Fees Under A.R.S. § 12-2030(A), Even if the Action is Not Formally Entitled “Mandamus.”