2009 - Page 11 of 25 - Osborn Maledon, P.A.

Carondelet Health Network v. Atteberry – 6/12/2009

July 2, 2009

Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Holds That The Physician-Patient Privilege Does Not Protect a Patient's Identity From Disclosure, Where Such Disclosure Would Not Lead to the Revealing of Confidential Medical Information.

Aida v.MaricopaCounty – 6/11/2009

June 23, 2009

Arizona Court ofAppeals Division One Holds That a Tax Discrimination Claim May Be Based on the Initial Values Assessed.

County ofCochise (6/16/2009)

June 23, 2009

Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two Meaning of A.R.S. § 11-830(A)(2) and Holds that Feed Lot Operations are Not “General Agricultural Uses” Exempt from County Zoning.

Huerta v. Superior Court (6/16/2009)

June 23, 2009

Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Holds That a Party Whose Case is Consolidated With Another May Not Exercise a Peremptory Change of Judge if a Party on the Same Side in the Other Case Has Already Exercised a Peremptory Change of Judge.

Arpaio v. Davis – 6/2/2009

June 17, 2009

Arizona Court of Appeals Division One Affirms that Arizona Supreme Court Rule 123 Governs Requests for Judicial Records and a Presiding Judge May Appoint Another Judge on the Same Court to Perform an Administrative Review of Requested Records.

Cardi Am. Corp. v. All Am. House & Apartment Movers, L.L.C. – 5/26/2009

June 5, 2009

Arizona Court ofAppeals Division Two Holds That Where a Lease Provides for Its Termination at the Lessor ’s Option on Condemnation of the Property, the Lessee Has No Right to Compensation for the Taking if the Option is Exercised.

AzApp Blog Covering Arizona's Appellate Courts

Yearly Archives: 2009

Carondelet Health Network v. Atteberry – 6/12/2009

Aida v.MaricopaCounty – 6/11/2009

County ofCochise (6/16/2009)

Huerta v. Superior Court (6/16/2009)

Arpaio v. Davis – 6/2/2009

Cardi Am. Corp. v. All Am. House & Apartment Movers, L.L.C. – 5/26/2009

Editors

Contributors

Editor Emeritus

Read More

Join Our Newsletter

Browse by Year